Jump to content

The Rllmuk Photography Thread


Sng
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iknowgungfu said:

So - will you be dropping some money on a "proper" camera and all the other side costs soon? :D

@bradigor

 

We are looking at me getting a Sony a5100 and giving him the NEX-6 and sharing lenses. To get going anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bordesley Street, Birmingham.

 

Part of a photography project I'm involved with in Birmingham (link) which is mapping the city in 2020. This was on a street I'd been allocated, they are looking for square crops but I like it a bit wider. I think the fact that the double yellow lines which only got repainted this week end by the door is aesthetically displeasing and I hate the stupid font they chose for their sign but there's something about the scene I really enjoy.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@SeanR

 

If they just want one versatile lens - get the EF-M 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM

For a light big range zoom, it's ok apparently. I wouldn't be arsed to get a bigger heavier EF-S lens needing an adapter, to get slightly sharper pictures

image gallery

https://www.dpreview.com/samples/9488673812/canon-ef-m-18-150-f3-5-6-3-is-stm-gallery-posted

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Struggling a little at the moment to get my photo mojo back since lock down, I've been out a few times in the evenings the last couple of weeks but really struggling to get good compositions despite having fairly good conditions. 

 

I got these two last night, which are probably the best of the bunch.

 

(I should have taken more time here as the composition is actually ok but I should have taken a bracketed exposure and merged them later. As it is the sun effect is blown out and that distracts from the image)

5G1A9585-2-L.jpg

 

(This is a fairly safe composition, one I sometimes grab just to get something in the bag!)

5G1A9555-L.jpg

 

The remaining shots are just eh in my opinion so I won't bother posting them. I think I'm so relieved to be getting out that I'm putting pressure on myself to get something good!

 

I've also been trying to get back into macro photography but my results so far have been a horrible blurred mess! Last year I got it nailed but I can't seem to get it together now! Looking to invest in a new macro lens but I think more practice is needed before I splash the cash. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hadn't yet.  I didn't get home from London until after 11 and it was gone midnight before I took the photos off my camera. I had a quick look through them and tinkered with a couple before falling asleep.   I was shooting bracketed because I was trying to figure out the effect the shutter speed would have on the rain, I think this was 1/75 which makes the rainfall look amazing (in my opinion at least) but doesn't work at all when people were running for shelter, the images with faster shutter speeds have fairly sharp subjects but the rain doesn't look as good to me.

 

 

 

 

DSCF1231-Enhanced-3.jpg

 

I think I prefer the colour, though I'm going to desaturate the people beneath the shelter on the right of the frame, especially that orange skirt.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very much of the same school of thought there, get as much right in camera as you can and so on.  I don't like HDR gore or seeing the Milky Way pasted on top of a shot of a busy city centre for example. Playing around with tone curves is really all I do.  

 

 

20200614_033248.jpg

 

I posted this one on Reddit, it's an in camera jpeg, albeit cropped to 4x3 as I didn't want the guy crossing the road too far to the right of the frame.  It's weird how different the light looks here too. Same camera, same lens and practically the same spot, I'd just turned to the left a bit. It's weird how much red the bricks from the buildings were reflecting back onto the road in the first angle and how much that just disappeared here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, HarryBizzle said:

I like the saturation in that skirt. As someone who prefers very subtle post processing, it’s a reminder that it’s not a photoshop job - just a great photo in great light. 

 

I agree this is a lovely shot, for me street photography is best when it looks timeless and here it does. I actually prefer the B&W conversion but both work.

 

Here's my cat, Mango. She was sleeping on the garage roof so I was able to get to her level. I risked my life getting this close to her paws so I hope you like it. 

5G1A9612-L.jpg

 

I've also attached a photo of a bee I got yesterday in the garden. Practicing manual focus with the macro. The front of the bee is perfectly sharp, but the rest is a long way off. Closest I've got to a in flight bee, little buggers are hard to capture. 

5G1A9685.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some more coastal shots from last night. Quite happy with these:

 

The locals call this bay Pirate Cove, and every day a local writes the name out in pebbles when the tide is out.

 

5G1A9722-HDR-L.jpg

 

Just around the corner is part of our seafront, this is taken right at the mouth of the river Exe.

5G1A9714-L.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

this is a touch experimental, done with a drone and multiple shots then composited. i wanted the cityscape but then having all the lights streaming upward. it almost worked, I think there was movement between the streaming shot and the multishot hdr for the cityscape.

 

 

DJI_0465-HDR.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, majic said:

this is a touch experimental, done with a drone and multiple shots then composited. i wanted the cityscape but then having all the lights streaming upward. it almost worked, I think there was movement between the streaming shot and the multishot hdr for the cityscape.

 

 

DJI_0465-HDR.jpg

That's a cool effect, worth exploring more. From a compositional point of view, the lower quarter of the image distracts and makes it look a little messy. However from a quarter upwards it looks really interesting. 

Which drone incidentally?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PeteJ said:

That's a cool effect, worth exploring more. From a compositional point of view, the lower quarter of the image distracts and makes it look a little messy. However from a quarter upwards it looks really interesting. 

Which drone incidentally?

Cheers! Agreed about the lower third, I think I need to stack a few more images for the cityscape so I can increase the exposure without too much grain. 

 

Shot with a dji mavic pro 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

moon.thumb.png.e9756ebc6b5d3b754636709c775ddc26.png

 

Quite pleased with this, for a beginner.

 

Canon EOS 600D with a Sigma 55-200mm lens (at full extension obviously). ISO 100, f/5.6, shutter 1/100s.

 

Obviously heavily cropped afterwards, as a 200mm lens still isn't very long so it's tiny in the frame. I have a telescope but no DSLR adapter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did a photoshoot for a fitness model yesterday and took my 24-70 f2-8 and 70-200 f4 

 

Barely used my 70-200 F4 since getting it so decided half way to switch to it. Holy shit is it amazing. Being a noob, I decided f4 wasn’t any good as f4 is too high for blur but fuck me am I dumb. It’s amazing as portrait lens and the auto focus work much better than the 24-70! 
 

 

F1EA03D1-892D-476A-99B2-8FBF01DEF478.jpeg

E41208DE-C448-42DF-BC13-14F3D0D3BFBC.jpeg

E4DA63E2-D313-4FC6-9400-4FF557F94C0C.jpeg

FB0DF924-5877-4BD6-8275-D7C6F9FBC1E5.jpeg

B02F10F8-E06C-4839-BD79-5AE79C34F33A.jpeg

B75B6B48-3E6A-4972-8B58-492E6375CB38.jpeg

2BA222C9-4AE0-4EEE-B100-FA8BDABBDDC0.jpeg

9F6C7641-B4C7-499D-B192-63CEFD2E76D1.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are really nice, and f/4 is fine for bokeh if you are shooting at longer focal lengths, especially if the background is a fair distance behind the subject. You're getting blur between the dumbbell and her face in one of the shots, was that with the 70-200?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. That was the 70-200. I did two or three shots in the same posting, that one was intentionally focussed on the dumbbells but she didn’t come out as blurred as I had hoped.

 

I think I’m revolving beyond being a shooting wide open noon and understand the advantages  of fstops beyond 1.4 and 1.8 :lol:

 

Am I right in thinking I could get some good blur with the 70-200 by shooting at 200mm but say f8? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the distance to the background, I guess it's down to experimentation.  I'm not experienced at all in portrait photography besides shooting my kids (who refuse to cooperate :lol:) but just through osmosis I know the classic focal lengths for portraiture seem to be 50, 85 and 135mm (35/50/90 if you shoot APS-C) and nobody ever got sacked for shooting at f/8.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.